🔁
Repeatable beats heroic
If a migration depends on the one engineer who knows the quirks, it is not a process. It runs from a queue or it does not scale.
01Approach
How we approach an acquisition
Three convictions from 10,000+ onboardings and migrations. They decide how the work is cut long before anyone opens a data model.
🎭
The rehearsal is the performance
The full path is run against real data before go-live, as often as needed. What you approve in the test is what goes live.
🗣
No 'everything will look the same'
The customer is told what moves, what changes and what disappears, before the cutover. Managed expectations survive go-live; promises do not.
02Mechanics
How it works
Six steps from signature to a running queue. The first four happen once, the last two repeat per wave.
Connect source and target
The acquired systems on one side, the platform they are moving into on the other. Read access is enough to start.
Connect the systems around it
Your CRM brings the customer list with owner, value and date, or you upload it. Your roadmap tool, Jira, ProductBoard or Linear, brings what engineering still owes them. Both decide the wave order later.
Load the data and see the structure
Tables, relations and the awkward corners become visible from the data itself. No workshop reconstructs what a system does better than its own records.
Approve the transformation
AI drafts the mapping against anonymised data in your own region. Your engineers approve it, and that approved version is what runs.
Get the wave schedule
Readiness, missing features and your own capacity decide the order. The platform proposes it, you adjust it instead of building it.
Release the waves
Your team works one queue with one structure and the target KPIs in view. Each wave is validated against the target and written to the record before the next is released.
03Capabilities
What's inside
Every headline backed by a concrete workflow. Screenshots show what your team will actually use.
Capability 01
Several source systems, one solution
Each acquired platform is a source bucket, mapped into the same target model by the same engine that runs your everyday onboardings. A new customer, a single switcher and a whole acquired base are the same job at different volumes.
Capability 02
Put the start button in the acquired product
After an acquisition the source system is usually yours too. A button or a banner inside it lets each customer start their own migration, and the export goes straight to a secured API. Everything after that runs without you.
Which acquisition is waiting to be consolidated?
20-minute call. Tell us how many source systems are in the way, we walk you through how the waves would be cut.
Capability 03
Who can move first, and who has to wait
Every uploaded dataset shows which features that customer actually relies on. Where the target already covers them, they go in the first wave. Where it does not, you see the revenue waiting on the roadmap.
Capability 04
The queue does the carrying
Every customer in a wave enters a queue and is processed automatically, validated against the target on the way. Hand-run migrations stop at a handful. A queue does not care whether it is fifty or five thousand.
Capability 05
A frozen record at cutover
The state at cutover is written to an immutable audit trail: timestamped, per tenant, kept for ten years. Whatever anyone asks twelve months later, the answer is still on file.
04Use cases
Situations we keep seeing
Anonymised from our customer base. See whether one of them is yours.
Fitness software, market leader
Scenario
Acquired competitor platforms on one side, customers won off rivals on the other. Both meant somebody else's data model had to become theirs.
Outcome
A repeatable path from any competitor system into the target platform, run often enough that it now sets the standard for the industry.
PE-backed vendor with three systems
Scenario
Three acquired platforms, three data models, one target. Handled separately it would have been three engineering projects with three audit trails.
Outcome
A triple migration through one engine, with one report format the investment committee could read across all three.
Software vendor after a merger
Scenario
Two customer bases across several countries, each with its own data model, expected to run as one platform.
Outcome
The bases brought together wave by wave, with the differences resolved before cutover rather than discovered by customers afterwards.
05Our approach
What we do differently
We run consolidation as a flow rather than a project: planned from readiness data, worked off a queue. What each habit earns you closes every card.
Flow, not a fixed projectMapping, validation rules and the wave cut stay in the platform instead of leaving with a project. Your second acquisition therefore starts where the first finished — not from zero with a new team and the same lessons.
Planned from data, not from datesThe wave plan follows readiness per account — data quality, open feature gaps, sign-offs — and recalculates when something slips. You report against dates that hold instead of a plan that has been fiction since it was signed.
A process, not one person's headEvery migration runs off the same queue, and a wave is released rather than started by hand. Go-live no longer depends on the holiday calendar of the one engineer who knows the quirks.
06Across the platform
Pairs well with
Other parts of the platform you'll use alongside this.
Frequently asked
That is the normal case. Each system is a source bucket into the same target model, mapped by the same engine, with one audit trail across all of them.
Through a secured API. In an acquisition you normally control the source system, so the cleanest route is a button or banner inside it that hands the export over directly. Where that is not possible, the customer uploads in their portal instead.
You could, one at a time. The difference is the queue: a released wave is worked through automatically, customer after customer, with validation on the way. Run by hand, each customer is its own small project, and a base of thousands never finishes.
Yes, and it is the same mechanism. A competitor export is a source system like any other, which turns a bespoke project into a repeatable path.
What moved, what matched, what differed per data type, and the frozen state at cutover. We walk you through a real one on a call.
With an assessment of the source systems. Volume, data model and the awkward parts decide the wave plan, and they decide it before anyone commits to a date.
Ready to see it on your data?
20-minute call. Show us your source, we show you the mapping. No deck required.